The same principle was expressed in Vana v. Tosta, 1967 CanLII 21 (SCC), [1968] S.C.R. 71, where one of the issues involved an award for the cost of future housekeeping services. The majority of the court stated at p. 75: It is trite law that a wrongdoer cannot claim the benefit of services donated to the injured party. In the present case it amounts in my judgment to conscripting the mother and mother-in-law to the services of the appellant and his children for the benefit of the tortfeasor and any reduction of the award on this basis is and was an error in principle.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.