What is the standard of review for an application by a plaintiff who alleges she was sexually harassed by her partner while they were out together?
Manitoba, Canada
The following excerpt is from Pollock et al. v. Human Rights Commission (Manitoba) et al., 2018 MBQB 170 (CanLII):
This application was heard over three days, being June 16 and September 22, 2017, and June 13, 2018. At the June 16, 2017 hearing, all parties agreed that the standard of review was reasonableness as the adjudicator was interpreting her home statute, which is contemplated by Dunsmuir v. New Brunswick, 2008 SCC 9, [2008] 1 S.C.R. 190. This hearing was adjourned by consent of the parties, as there was an expressed interest in reaching a settlement.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What is the standard of review on an application for judicial review? (Manitoba, Canada)
What is the standard of review in a child support application? (Manitoba, Canada)
What is the applicable standard of review for the appeal of a decision in a personal injury case? (Manitoba, Canada)
What is the applicable standard of review for errors of law? (Manitoba, Canada)
What is the standard of review applicable in a civil case? (Manitoba, Canada)
What is the proper standard of review in the context of a motion for judicial review? (Manitoba, Canada)
What is the proper standard of review in the judicial review process? (Manitoba, Canada)
What is the standard of appellate review applicable to all factual conclusions of a trial judge? (Manitoba, Canada)
What is the range of aggravated damages for a plaintiff who was sexually harassed by a member of the Church of Scientology? (Manitoba, Canada)
What is the standard of review for the identification and application of the correct legal principles? (Manitoba, Canada)
