It is important here to underline the fact that a trial is not a sort of “credibility contest”, in which the trier of fact is required to choose between competing versions of the facts. On the contrary, in trials where there are two versions of the same events, it is not simply a question which version the trial judge favours or believes; rather, the role of the trial judge is to assess the testimony of the accused and to determine whether the exculpatory testimony is believed, whether it raises a reasonable doubt, and failing both, whether the prosecution has proven its case beyond a reasonable doubt. See Gahan v. R., 2014 NBCA 18, at paragraph 1.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.