Once a determination has been made on who is the dominant driver, the onus of proving negligence shifts to the servient driver: Dawes v. Valadas, 2005 BCSC 1319 at para. 31. A dominant through driver may still be negligent, but the correct analysis is to recognize that the through driver is breaching his common law and perhaps statutory obligations and to address the issue as one of apportioning fault, not to reclassify the through driver as servient based on the degree to which the through driver is in breach of his obligations: Nerval at para. 38.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.