The parties have jointly proposed an order. The reasons in Law Society of Upper Canada v. Cooper, 2009 ONLSAP 7 at para. 19 provide the following guidance as to the role of a hearing panel in this circumstance: Generally, a hearing panel should not “tinker” with the joint submission, as long as it is not contrary to the public interest, by substituting another penalty that is also within a range of reasonableness. Simply put, only truly unreasonable or “unconscionable” joint submissions should be rejected.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.