The court further held that even if a risk is a mere possibility which ordinarily need not be disclosed, if its occurrence carries serious consequences, as for example, paralysis or death, it should be regarded as a material risk requiring disclosure. At p. 660 of the decision in Hopp v. Lepp, Laskin C.J. stated: In summary, the decided cases appear to indicate that, in obtaining the consent of a patient for the performance upon him of a surgical operation, a surgeon, generally, should answer any specific questions posed by the patient as to the risks involved and should, without being questioned, disclose to him the nature of the proposed operation, its gravity, any material risks and any special or unusual risks attendant upon the performance of the operation. ...
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.