The appropriate test for balancing the relevant competing interests was articulated by Dickson J. in Hunter v. Southam Inc., 1984 CanLII 33 (SCC), [1984] SCJ 36, 11 DLR (4th) 641at pp. 159-60 as follows: [A]n assessment must be made as to whether in a particular situation the public's interest in being left alone by government must give way to the government's interest in intruding on the individual's privacy in order to advance its goals, notably those of law enforcement. Where the constitutional line of “reasonableness” will be drawn then becomes a function of both the importance of the state objective and the degree of impact on the individual's privacy interest.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.