It is not necessary for the citizen to show that his right to life, his right to liberty and his right to security of the person have all been violated in order to constitute a breach of this section. It is sufficient that one of them has been violated. Further, "security of the person" must encompass freedom from the threat of physical punishment or suffering as well as freedom from such punishment itself: see Singh v. Canada (Minister of Employment and Immigration) (1985), 1985 CanLII 65 (SCC), 17 D.L.R. (4th) 422 at p. 460, [1985] 1 S.C.R. 177, 14 C.R.R. 13, per Wilson J.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.