What is the test for identifying the issue to be reviewed in a review hearing?
British Columbia, Canada
The following excerpt is from Murphy v. Murphy, 2015 BCSC 408 (CanLII):
It is therefore important to clearly identify the issue to be reviewed so that the party seeking a change in the order does not interpret the review hearing as a right to reargue their position on the order sought to be changed. An ambiguous review provision may present difficulties, as occurred in Leskun v. Leskun 2006 SCC 25, [2006] 1 S.C.R. 920 where Mr. Justice Binnie observed:
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
In what circumstances will a judge refuse to hear an application to review an order made by the issuing judge? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is it open to a review panel to review all matters falling under Section 63(2) if they have been rejected at the leave hearing? (British Columbia, Canada)
What are the standards of review applicable to a judicial review of a decision made under the Rules of Review Act? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is a review hearing in the superior court a de novo hearing or an appeal? (British Columbia, Canada)
What are the issues costs for a party who is substantially successful on a discrete issue or issue? (British Columbia, Canada)
How have courts interpreted Bolster Review Review Review for mixed fact and law? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can a common issue or issue be tried in advance of individual issues? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can a adjudicator hear evidence that attacks the basis for a 24-hour prohibition issued on November 14, 2015? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is a decision of a police officer to issue a 24-hour prohibition subject to judicial review? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the standard of review for all issues the petitioner raises? (British Columbia, Canada)
