As in Schwartz v. R., supra, it was not a retirement allowance because the award was not with respect to a loss of employment under subsection 248(1). One must consider the starting point. One must be in the service. This excludes prospective or intended employment.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.