The claimant succeeded on only two issues, and on the issue of unfairness his success was only partial in its extent. He was unsuccessful on several issues. The respondent succeeded in proving and upholding most of the oral agreement, but certainly not all of it. She also failed in her attempt to show entitlement to spousal support. As I see it, neither party can properly be characterized as being “the successful party,” as that term has been defined in the case law since Fotheringham v. Fotheringham 2001 BCSC 1321. Moreover, to award any costs to either party would upset the judgment which I have made and which I consider to be just.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.