The respondent submits that this court is bound by the judicial precedent in Idziak v. Canada (Minister of Justice), 1992 CanLII 51 (SCC), [1992] 3 S.C.R. 631, 77 C.C.C. (2d) 65 that those respective roles can properly be exercised by the same person. The respondent further submits that the applicants have failed to meet the onus that rests with them to establish a breach of s. 7 of the Charter. Carter v. Canada (Attorney General), 2015 SCC 5 at para. 55.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.