Yet in the interests of fairness and certainty, the claimant should have advised the respondent in a timely manner the details of a special expense and why it was being incurred. It is unfair and unreasonable to expect the respondent to pay a lump sum for past special and extraordinary expenses, especially in the amounts the claimant seeks, when she has not informed him of the nature and extent of those expenses: Petersen v. Petersen, 2007 BCSC 497 at para. 30.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.