Is the Respondent's argument for inclusion of the Supplement in the equalization calculation?
Ontario, Canada
The following excerpt is from Lamothe v. Lamothe, 2006 CanLII 42360 (ON SC):
In view of Lowe v. Lowe, the Respondent’s argument for the inclusion of the supplement, or any part of it, in the equalization calculation, must fail. C. The Respondent’s R.S.P.:
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Is Rule 2.02 of the Rules of Civil Procedure applicable to Respondent Respondents to Respondents Respondents? (Ontario, Canada)
How has the equalization of a jointly owned cottage been calculated in the calculation of matrimonial property? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the effect of postponing equalization of a husband's pension equalization until after the husband’s pension is equalized? (Ontario, Canada)
Is a credit card agreement providing for interest at 2.4% per month calculated on the previous month’s balance calculated on a monthly basis calculated on an annual rate of 28.8%? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the factor considered in determining whether a delay in responding to an application is prejudice to responding parties? (Ontario, Canada)
Where a respondent was unaware of an accommodation need, can the respondent be liable? (Ontario, Canada)
Is equalization of net family properties equalization a general rule? (Ontario, Canada)
Is Vicki's contribution to the matrimonial home equalization calculation sufficient? (Ontario, Canada)
Can the respondent appeal against the findings of guilt on both counts of sexual assault against the respondent? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the effect of the applicant paying the respondent’s portion of maintenance for the respondent's property? (Ontario, Canada)
