What is the test for an offer in a personal injury action?

Ontario, Canada


The following excerpt is from Gogas v. Gogas, 2011 ONSC 5368 (CanLII):

The applicant made two offers to settle this proceeding, the first dated March 14, 2011 and the second dated June 3, 2011. The initial offer is not signed by counsel as required by subrule 18(4). The respondent argues that as such it does not meet the formal requirements of an offer within the meaning of Rule 18 and therefore is a nullity, and relies on Riss v. Greenough (2003), 2003 CanLII 2224 (ON SC), 37 R.F.L. (5th) 426 (Ont. S.C.J.) in support of that proposition.

Other Questions


Is a motion to add as parties to a personal injury action for personal injury costs granted? (Ontario, Canada)
Can a party to a personal injury action be regarded as a "voluntary" party to the action? (Ontario, Canada)
Can a lawyer be personally liable for costs in a personal injury action? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the legal test for disbursements of personal injury compensation in personal injury cases? (Ontario, Canada)
When determining whether a party has been successful in obtaining a final order in a personal injury action, does the court have to consider any other settlement offer made by the parties? (Ontario, Canada)
What are the requirements for an offer to settle a claim in a personal injury action? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the current state of the law on personal injury representation in personal injury cases? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for making a reasonable offer before trial in a personal injury action? (Ontario, Canada)
Does Rule 18(14) relating to formal Offers to Settle apply to quantum of costs in a personal injury action? (Ontario, Canada)
How have the courts in Canada dealt with the issue of personal injury cases involving personal injury claims? (Ontario, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.