Conversely, there is the concern raised by the respondent that the applicant behaved unreasonably by entrenching himself in his position and not making an offer to settle that reflected a compromise from his pleaded claim to a 50% interest in the respondent’s property: see Potter v. Da Silva, 2014 ONCJ 443, para. 22. Having regard to one of the primary objectives of the Family Law Rules mentioned earlier, which is to encourage settlements, parties who do not engage in meaningful settlement negotiations (for example, by not making an offer of compromise against their pleaded claim) may not be considered to be acting reasonably.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.