The claimant must also establish that there was a causal connection between the deprivation and the enrichment. The claimant must have made a contribution to the respondent’s benefit that is “sufficiently substantial”. A “minor or indirect contribution” is not sufficient (Peter at 997). If a substantial and direct contribution is established the extent of the claimant’s interest is proportionate to their contribution (Pettkus v. Becker, 1980 CanLII 22 (SCC), [1980] 2 S.C.R. 834 at 852-53).
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.