The applicant also alleges bias on the part of the members of the appeal panel who reconsidered their own decision. Since I agree with the respondent, I adopt most of his arguments. First, the applicant should have raised this argument at the earliest opportunity, i.e., at the hearing of the first application to reconsider (March 29, 2000) or at the hearing of the second application (January 15, 2002). He cannot rely on it for the first time in his application for judicial review. Not raising it is tantamount to waiving this argument [Hudon v. Canada (Attorney General), [2001] F.C.J. No. 1836 (F.C.)].
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.