In support of number one, the respondent cites the case of Chassie v. Venczel, [2002] B.C.J. No. 246. This case can be distinguished on its facts. It also cited the case of C.J.L.W. v. A.M.D., [2002] Y.J. No. 102. This case describes what is a very close matter and in considering the closeness of the decision on the issues, the judge decided that there should be no order for costs. Each party should bear their own costs.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.