The following excerpt is from Herring v. The Queen, 2022 TCC 41 (CanLII):
Justice Woods relied on Canada v. Doubinin, 2005 FCA 298, finding that inflated tax receipts are not benefits that vitiate a gift and that, if there is no benefit, subsections 248(30), (31) and (32) do not apply. She concluded that each appellant was entitled to a tax credit equal to 10% of the face value of the receipt.
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.