What is the test for determining whether the court has jurisdiction to review the issues (in part) raised by the Petitioners?
British Columbia, Canada
The following excerpt is from Surrey Knights Junior Hockey v The Pacific Junior Hockey League, 2018 BCSC 1748 (CanLII):
Recognizing that contractual rights are at stake here, the Respondent agrees that the court has jurisdiction to review the issues (in part) raised by the Petitioners. The Respondent suggests the issues raised in the Petition should be framed in accordance with Lakeside Colony of Hutterian Brethren v. Hofer, [1992] 3 S.C.R. 16 [Hofer]. I agree.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What are the relevant factors for determining whether either of two possible jurisdictions would be suitable for the determination of issues raised by the litigation at issue? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is the Chief Justice of the Court of Appeal of the Supreme Court of B.C holding that the Court has jurisdiction to determine whether a person who is not a party to a particular type of tortfeasor has a valid claim? (British Columbia, Canada)
In determining whether to grant a Rule 18A trial on part of a trust application, what is the risk that the findings of the application may be carried over to the subsequent determination of other issues? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for determining whether a court has jurisdiction or authority to issue injunctions or injunctions in a medical malpractice case? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does the absence of the Pao On evidentiary factors determine whether the issue of duress is an evidentiary issue? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the standard of review for all issues the petitioner raises? (British Columbia, Canada)
What are the relevant factors to determine whether a court has jurisdiction to hear a claim in a personal injury case? (British Columbia, Canada)
What factors will the Court consider in deciding whether it would be unjust to find that a summary trial is appropriate to consider the issues before deciding whether to proceed with a conventional trial? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the legal test for determining whether there has been anordinate delay in determining whether a claim has been successful? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is an extradition court a court of competent jurisdiction pursuant to s. 24 of the Charter and has the jurisdiction to grant Charter remedies? (British Columbia, Canada)
