What are the relevant factors for striking a response or claim?
British Columbia, Canada
The following excerpt is from 441170 B.C. Ltd. v. 0441169 B.C. Ltd., 2014 BCSC 1161 (CanLII):
The relevant factors in cases where the non-compliance of one of the parties causes an application by the opposing party to have the response or claim struck, were considered by Fitzpatrick J. in Schwarzinger v. Bramwell, 2011 BCSC 304.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
When a trial judge fails to mention a relevant factor in the trial, does that mean that the relevant factor has not been considered? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is resolution of an important part of a claim against a party in a personal injury claim against the other party to the claim substantially less impact on the balance of the claim? (British Columbia, Canada)
What are the principles for striking out a response to a civil claim? (British Columbia, Canada)
What are the relevant factors to determine whether a court has jurisdiction to hear a claim in a personal injury case? (British Columbia, Canada)
What are the relevant factors for assessing a claim for Occupational Rent from a plaintiff who was ousted from her home? (British Columbia, Canada)
What are the relevant factors for striking a pleading? (British Columbia, Canada)
How have courts in BC considered factors relevant to the consideration of the first factor in a plaintiff's refusal to accept an offer to settle? (British Columbia, Canada)
What are the relevant factors for an in trust claim? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the relevant relevance and effect factor for admitting expert evidence at trial? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does the court need to consider all the relevant factors before making a decision on a "checklist" of factors? (British Columbia, Canada)
