What is the test for a reasonable standard of conduct in a personal injury case?

Manitoba, Canada


The following excerpt is from Sowemimo v. College of Physicians & Surgeons of Manitoba, 2014 MBQB 4 (CanLII):

Where the reasonable standard applies, it requires the affording of a certain deference. In applying the standard of “reasonableness”, the reviewing court must determine if the outcome falls within a range of possible, acceptable outcomes which are defensible in respect of the facts and law. See Dunsmuir v. New Brunswick, 2008 SCC 9, [2008] 1 S.C.R. 190 at para. 47.

Other Questions


What is the applicable standard of review for the appeal of a decision in a personal injury case? (Manitoba, Canada)
Is the court’s position on costs for personal injury cases in the context of the case management system? (Manitoba, Canada)
Is the Respondent entitled to reasonable costs in a personal injury case? (Manitoba, Canada)
What considerations must be considered in the context of a motion for summary judgment in a personal injury case? (Manitoba, Canada)
What are the implications of a plaintiff’s new pleadings in a personal injury case? (Manitoba, Canada)
What is the test for new evidence in a personal injury case? (Manitoba, Canada)
What is the definition of a "factual situation" in a personal injury case? (Manitoba, Canada)
What is the range of damages for battery and sexual assault in a personal injury case? (Manitoba, Canada)
What is the test for determining the range of general damages in a personal injury case? (Manitoba, Canada)
What constitutes a scandalous pleading in a personal injury case? (Manitoba, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.