This “real and substantial connection” test requires that a significant connection exists between the causes of action and the foreign court. A defendant can reasonably be brought within the embrace of a foreign jurisdictions law where he or she has participated in something of significance or was actively involved in that foreign jurisdiction. A fleeting or relatively unimportant connection will not be enough to give a foreign court jurisdiction. The connection to the foreign jurisdiction must be a substantial one. Beals v. Saldanha, supra, para. 32
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.