In only one of those cases that I have mentioned so far can it be said that the ratio decidendi is that the test is subjective. Even in that case, Regina v. Towler, the result of the application of the subjective test was to narrow the scope of "persons in authority". In other words, the result of the application of the subjective test was to hold a person who objectively was a person in authority not to be such.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.