In Duke v. The Queen (supra) the accused was charged with driving a motor vehicle having consumed alcohol in such quantity that the proportion thereof in his blood exceeded 80 milligrams of alcohol in 100 millilitres of blood contrary to then s. 224 of the Criminal Code. Eight days after a breath sample was taken from the accused, his counsel requested a sample of that breath. Counsel was advised that no sample was available. It was argued on behalf of the accused that the failure to provide the sample was a violation of s. 2(e) of the Canadian Bill of Rights.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.