Is there any case law where evidence relating to one count in an Information is inadmissible in relation to another count?

British Columbia, Canada


The following excerpt is from R. v. Bulua, 2006 BCSC 1234 (CanLII):

The Appellant argues that this is an error in law, and that evidence relating to one count in an Information is inadmissible in relation to another count except where “similar fact” evidence is involved: Rarru v. The Queen, 1996 CanLII 195 (SCC), [1996] 2 S.C.R. 165, 107 C.C.C. (3d) 53.

Other Questions


In what circumstances will the BCSC find that evidence of J.B. and her evidence be inconsistent in relation to particular events? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does the implied undertaking arise in relation to evidence obtained at an examination in aid of execution? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is a plaintiff required to lead expert evidence to overcome a no evidence motion? (British Columbia, Canada)
What defines an informed person and what defines that informed person? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for exclusion of a party while another party is giving evidence? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the impact of inadmissible evidence in an affidavit? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does a no evidence motion where a real estate agent defendant argued that there was no expert evidence sufficient to establish a standard of care? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can a third party resident of another province resident in another province be ordered to produce his or her records to a litigant? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the difference between giving false information to the police and giving no information? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can a party who has not produced evidence in favour of their position, or has no reasonable explanation for failing to call the evidence? (British Columbia, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.