The payments were not loans because there was no loan agreement between the parties. Proma did not have an obligation to repay the amounts advanced and at the time the advances were made Proma had ceased operating and, accordingly, no implied prospect of repayment existed. She cited Davisson v. The Queen[6] in that regard.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.