Is there an obligation on a Public Prosecution Service officer to consider all the relevant and significant evidence available?
Canada (Federal), Canada
The following excerpt is from Chudal v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2005 FC 1073 (CanLII):
There is an obligation on the PRRA Officer to consider the latest relevant and significant evidence available. As Pinard J. said in Omar v. Solicitor General of Canada, [2004] F.C. 1740 at paragraph 7:
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
When a hearing officer disagrees with a decision made by the reviewing officer on the issues with which he disagreed with the hearing officer, how will the review officer's decision be considered? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Is there any evidence that a Public Prosecutions Officer (PRRA) ignored, misinterpreted or ignored or ignored the evidence? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
What is the test for a defendant to be found guilty of a series of criminal charges under New York State Public Prosecutions for failing to comply with the requirements of the Criminal Prosecution Service? ("New York", United States of America)
What is the standard of review for a decision by a Public Prosecutions Officer (PRRA) not to be reviewed because it is considered "globally and as a whole"? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
In a federal habeas review of a claim of insufficiency of evidence, what is the meaning of the phrase "all evidence must be considered in the light most favorable to the prosecution"? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Is a lawsuit against a public officer in his official capacity a way of pleading against the public entity of which the officer is an agent? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
In a federal habeas review of a claim of insufficient evidence, what is the meaning of the phrase "all evidence must be considered in the light of the prosecution"? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Can a hearing officer, parole officer, hearing officer and parole official be immunized from prosecution? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Is a refusal to respond to an officer's request to "open up" to the officer is privileged conduct which cannot be considered evidence of criminal wrongdoing? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Is statistical evidence relevant, relevant and probative when it reveals a disparity in treatment toward members of a racial minority in the course of certain discriminatory decisions by the employer? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
