Second, severance is possible, practically speaking. The factual portions are not linked inextricably to the gratuitous recommendations and analyses contained in the report. Nor are the factual portions recounted by the client, let alone recounted for the purpose of legal advice. The Prothonotary so found (at paragraph 30): …it is possible to sever the ‘fact-gathering’ investigative work product prepared by ‘Counsel’…These facts are separate and distinct from the advice given on legal issues that is privileged. This finding, mainly one of fact, should be respected: Housen v. Nikolaisen, 2002 SCC 33, [2002] 2 S.C.R. 235; H.L. v. Canada (Attorney General), 2005 SCC 25, [2005] 1 S.C.R. 401.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.