On an application for judicial review, it is not the result which is the subject of scrutiny, it is the process. Dunsmuir v. New Brunswick, 2008 SCC 9 sets out the two applicable standards of review: correctness and reasonableness. Questions of law that are of central importance to the legal system and that are outside the tribunal’s specialized area of expertise are reviewed on a correctness standard. When reviewing on a correctness standard, the reviewing court shows no deference to the decision-maker.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.