On all of the evidence, I find that the plaintiff was the dominant driver and had the right-of-way as she travelled along Uplands Drive. While she was likely exceeding the speed limit, and may have been going faster than her engineer’s posited 56 km/h, I am persuaded by the eye-witness testimony that her speed was not excessive or negligent. The servient driver bears the onus of establishing that the speed of the dominant driver contributed to the collision: see Borecka v. Wilkins, 2017 BCSC 13 at para. 18. I find that the defendant has failed to discharge this onus.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.