The issue is whether or not the plaintiff by his conduct repudiated his contract of employment. In Gould v. Hermes Electronics Ltd. (1979), 34 N.S.R.(2d) 321; 59 A.P.R. 321, it was held that the refusal of the employee to carry out his duties was not a single act of disobedience but an ultimatum that he would not carry out his duties unless the employer granted a salary increase demanded by him. His refusal to carry out his duties in these circumstances was justification for his dismissal.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.