In this case I note that what is being sought here is more than blood or urine testing, as was the nature of the order made in the decision of Siemens v. Motruk, [2002] 11 W.W.R. 399 (S.C.) which was referred to by counsel in their submissions. It is more than rebuttal evidence. Its purpose is to determine if there is evidence of a new possible contributing cause to the plaintiff's condition, in particular the plaintiff's cognitive and executive functioning.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.