What is the test for summary judgment in a case that definitely involves Rylands v Fletcher principles?
Alberta, Canada
The following excerpt is from Norwood Foundry Limited v. Stadium Holdings Ltd., 2009 ABQB 291 (CanLII):
This is an application by the plaintiff for summary judgment in a case that definitely involves Rylands v. Fletcher principles, but there is a substantial wrinkle that takes it out of the usual case. The strict liability principle still applies but the problem is in quantifying what portion of the damage is attributable to the defendant and what portion is attributable to the plaintiff.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What is the legal test for summary judgment or summary dismissal? (Alberta, Canada)
How have the courts in the United States and Canada interpreted the principles of the Court of Appeal in the context of a motion for summary judgment? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the effect of the Rylands v Fletcher principles on nuisance claims? (Alberta, Canada)
In what circumstances will a lender be able to obtain summary judgment in a claim that its agents were involved in a fraud? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the test for summary judgment in a motion for summary dismissal? (Alberta, Canada)
Can a summary judgment be granted in a case involving two separate actions? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the scope of a review of the evidence in the context of a motion for summary judgment? (Alberta, Canada)
In what circumstances will a court grant summary judgment in a personal injury action? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the legal test for a summary judgment in a contractual interpretation matter? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the legal test for a summary judgment application in chambers? (Alberta, Canada)
