As regards the adequacy of the wording used by the plaintiff in its draft amended statement of claim, and in particular allegation 10 dealing with the involvement of the individual defendants, it seems to me based on the evidence presented and the wording of the paragraph itself that the latter goes further than the wording criticized in Painblanc v. Kastner (1994), 58 C.P.R. (3d) 502. Here the complaint is actually directed in the allegations against the personal and the direct involvement of the individuals. It is not their acts as officers or shareholders which are in question.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.