The plaintiff in this case submits that the restrictive covenant is minor and it does not interfere with the owner's use and enjoyment of the property. Whether an encumbrance interferes with the owner's use and enjoyment of the property has been stated as being the basis for the determination of whether the encumbrance is trifling or more major: Bernard v. Weiss (1983), 31 R.P.R. 185 (B.C.S.C.).
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.