What is a material fact that may have affected the outcome of a garnishing order?
British Columbia, Canada
The following excerpt is from Li v Jin, 2020 BCSC 1324 (CanLII):
Thus, the plaintiff in this case was required to make full and frank disclosure of all material facts related to the cause of action asserted against the defendants. A material fact is one that may have affected the outcome of the application: see Evans v. Umbrella Capital LLC, 2004 BCCA 149 at para. 33. … d) There is discretion not to set aside the garnishing order if there was innocent non-disclosure (at para. 39):
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Does the consent order of 1981 consent order on spousal support issue order apply to a nominal support order? (British Columbia, Canada)
In what circumstances will the BC Supreme Court of Justice order a further review order to order that an expert in economic forecasting of the economic circumstances of a separated spouse be reviewed? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is a desk order pronounced on February 28, 2011 a dismissal of a request for a custody order and a support order? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for garnishing a garnishment order against an individual who has made a claim for damages against Bonterra Resources Inc? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is there a material change in circumstances affecting the child under a custody or access order? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for material change in a family law order? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can a joint guardianship order be ordered even if there is no cooperation necessary for joint custody? (British Columbia, Canada)
When a plumbing contractor is hired to complete plumbing services which includes the installation of materials and fixtures, does the contract stipulate that the materials used will be of good quality and reasonably fit for a purpose? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the current state of the law on leave to appeal from an order for special costs made separately from the substantive order? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is an order from an application to re-open and re-consider a decision, where the order from the first judgment had been entered, a matter of practice and procedure? (British Columbia, Canada)
