The plaintiff argues that, even if the trust is validly constituted, the assets in it should be found to be subject to a constructive trust for her benefit on the basis of the principles set out in Peter v. Beblow. The imposition of a constructive trust is available to remedy an unjust enrichment. An unjust enrichment arises, in the words of McLachlin J. (as she then was) in Peter v. Beblow at para. 3: ...when three elements are satisfied: (1) an enrichment; (2) a corresponding deprivation; and (3) the absence of a juristic reason for the enrichment.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.