Is it actionable negligence for a physician to adhere to one school of medical thought or approach and not another?

Ontario, Canada


The following excerpt is from Atack v. Castle, 2003 CanLII 8310 (ON SC):

It is not actionable negligence for a physician to adhere to one school of medical thought or approach and not another where there is conflicting evidence from highly qualified experts regarding the validity of a diagnosis, lack of a diagnosis, or the appropriate method of treatment. This is so, provided the physician can otherwise meet the standard of care of the average physician in his or her peer group. (See Lapointe v. Hôpital le Gardeur, supra).

Other Questions


What is the test for determining whether a professional who adheres to common professional practice is liable for negligence in a medical malpractice case? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for negligent negligence in medical malpractice cases? (Ontario, Canada)
Is a standard medical practice negligent in a medical malpractice case? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the standard of care in a medical negligence action? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for proving that a physician has not met the standard of care in a medical malpractice action? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for establishing causation in a medical negligence action? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the case law on medical malpractice in the context of medical negligence? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for a flexible approach to causation in medical negligence cases? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the case law on medical malpractice in the context of medical negligence cases? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for negligent negligence in a medical malpractice case? (Ontario, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.