What are the implications of a mere easement in the context of an easement application?

British Columbia, Canada


The following excerpt is from Kassell v. Probasco, 2007 BCSC 937 (CanLII):

The petitioners say that the easement in question contains no limitations and is equivalent to the transfer of a proprietary right; an impermissible result of a mere easement (per Baker J. in MacDonald v. Grant, [1993] B.C.J. No. 2158). FINDINGS

Other Questions


Can an application be brought to dismiss an application under s. 27(1)(c) of the Rules of Civil Procedure Act? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is there any case law where an unsuccessful applicant for Rule 18A application for a summary judgment or cost of costs? (British Columbia, Canada)
On an interim support application, can the court get bogged down with the merits of the application? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for estoppel in the context of a plaintiff’s application of estopple? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is a lawyer's duty to disclose all material facts in the context of an application? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the obligation of a firearms officer to contact the applicant before making a decision on a licence application? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does a judge have a duty to hear an application where the adjudicator of the application has been found in error? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can an application to dismiss on an interlocutory application be dismissed? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is there an alternative argument that the application of a law of general application to a particular group of Indians in a particular activity is legislation in their Indian-ness? (British Columbia, Canada)
In the context of s. 957(1) of the Municipal Corporations Act, can the City of Vancouver be found to be a vendor of land that is subject to a re-zoning application? (British Columbia, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.