Importantly, the hearing of the Petition was a final order determining the action. As such, the affidavit evidence filed by the petitioners should have been restricted to their direct knowledge. Instead, as noted, the petitioners’ affidavits improperly contained argument in the guise of evidence, scandalous remarks, personal opinions and groundless allegations of deceit. The filing of such affidavits may attract cost consequences: Sovereign General Insurance v. McNeill, 2007 BCSC 988 at para. 17.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.