Finally the petitioner submits that the audio-visual evidence was key to exercising his constitutionally entrenched right to make full answer and defence. That right arises in the context of s. 7 of the Charter (see, generally, Stinchombe). However, “the right or privilege to drive a motor vehicle on a public highway is not a liberty protected by s. 7” of the Charter (Buhlers v. British Columbia (Superintendent of Motor Vehicles), 1999 BCCA 114 at para. 110). As a result this argument fails.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.