On the other hand, counsel for the PC, acknowledges that false information was provide in the first application, but without the PC’s knowledge and that the errors were corrected in the second application. As well, she submits that he falls within the exceptions of the case laws Medel v. Canada and/or Oloumi v. Canada, in that, it is the officer’s error to process the second application regardless of the PC request not to do so, that caused the misrepresentation. Had the officer processed only the second application, there would have been no misrepresentation as the information provided in the second application is all accurate. The Law
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.