The applicant is forgetting that the finding about the DVD counts for very little among the other things that undermined his credibility with the panel. In particular, the panel found omissions, contradictions between his PIF and his testimony at the hearing and implausibilities in his narrative. It was entitled to draw adverse inferences about his credibility based on all of these factors: Tejeda v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2009 FC 421, at paragraph 15.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.