The panel correctly articulated the test in Law Society of Upper Canada v. Reilly. It considered the appellant’s past disciplinary history including other misappropriation. It carefully reviewed the evidence, including medical evidence submitted in mitigation. It concluded that revocation was the only appropriate penalty in the circumstances with which it was confronted.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.