48. The strata admits that it performed or paid for repairs inside other strata lots. However, it says those payments or repairs were to restore parts of those units that it deliberately removed to resolve a CP problem. It says its actions were consistent with prior CRT decisions such as Manak v. The Owners, Strata Plan KAS 2116, 2020, BCCRT 567. In Manak, I ordered the strata to pay to restore a strata lot to paint ready condition where it had caused deliberate damage to the owner’s strata lot to carry out its statutory obligations
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.