The following excerpt is from Bertram S. Miller Ltd. v. R., 1986 CanLII 4041 (FCA), [1986] 3 FC 291:
The respondent also relied on s. 2(e) of the Canadian Bill of Rights. But the inspector's order to destroy was made in what I have described as an "emergency situation", that is, under s. 9(4). There was a duty to act fairly, but in this emergency situation that duty did not extend to a duty to grant a hearing: see White v. Redfern (1879), 5 Q.B.D. 15, and De Verteuil v. Knaggs, [1918] A.C. 557 at pp. 560-1.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.