The parties agree that once there has been a finding of environmental harm under s. 145.2.1(2)(b), as is the case here, then the s. 145.2.1(3) onus provision does not apply and the general rule applies that the party who asserts a proposition must prove it. (See Snell v. Farrell, 1990 CanLII 70 (SCC), [1990] 2 S.C.R. 311, per Sopinka, J., at para. 17.) However, having agreed to this general proposition, the parties went on to make contrary arguments about the onus to prove particular remedies.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.