The onus of proof of misconduct lies on the employer. Madam Justice Griffin outlined the approach I must take in Hawkes v. Levelton Holdings Ltd., 2012 BCSC 1219 at para. 30, aff’d 2013 BCCA 306: The law is clear that not every act of dishonesty justifies dismissal without notice. Rather, the court must consider the context of the alleged misconduct, examining how minor or how serious it was. … The principle of proportionality applies, requiring a balancing between the severity of the alleged misconduct and the sanction imposed by the employer … .
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.